Nov 1 (Reuters) – After months of tears and tantrums, bitcoin wants to split up with stock markets.
The cryptocurrency, which has been closely correlated with tech stocks for much of its torrid 2022, is staging one of its strongest efforts yet to break away.
Its 30-day correlation with the Nasdaq (.IXIC) slid to 0.26 last week, its level lowest since early January, where a measure of 1 indicates the two assets are moving in lock step.
The correlation, which shows the degree to which the two move in sync with each other over a 30-day period, has hovered above 0.75 for much of the year and at times has approached perfect unison – at 0.96 and 0.93 in May and September.
For some crypto backers, any bitcoin break-up from Big Tech is a sign of strength.
“The latter’s growth has been somewhat tapped out, and investors are looking for the next growth industry. Bitcoin and crypto is one of those ‘next’ growth industries,” said Santiago Portela, CEO of FITCHIN, a Web3 gaming ecosystem.
The nascent uncoupling does indeed coincide with a period of comparative calm and consolidation for the teenage cryptocurrency a year after it began its epic nosedive from the heady heights of $69,000 hit in November last year.
Bitcoin is hovering near one-month highs around $20,500 and rose over 5% last week, outperforming the Nasdaq’s 2% gain as dour quarterly results from Microsoft (MSFT.O), Alphabet (GOOGL.O), Meta (META.O) and Amazon (AMZN.O) weighed.
HODLERS HOLDING OUT
The crypto winter has been cold and hard, though.
The total market cap for cryptocurrencies has shrunk by more than two-thirds to $984 billion from nearly $3 trillion in November 2021, according to CoinMarketCap.com.
Market participation has also dwindled, with the average daily trading volume of digital asset products falling to $61.3 million as of Oct. 25, far from the daily volumes of around $700 million seen last November, CryptoCompare data shows.
Nonetheless, months of persistent selling has failed to shake out the old hands, who are digging in despite a grim economic backdrop.
The dollar wealth held in bitcoins that haven’t been traded for three months or more is at an all-time-high, indicating accumulation by long-term holders or “HODLers”, according to blockchain data firm Glassnode. The name for that group of diehard crypto investors emerged years ago from a trader misspelling “hold” on an online forum.
Furthermore, a record 55,000 bitcoin were withdrawn from the largest exchange Binance on Oct. 26, according to analytics platform CryptoQuant showed, flows that typically signal coins are moving to wallets for longer-term storage.
“The holder base of BTC has changed drastically from being heavily weighted towards speculators, which largely came in in 2021, to the near cult-like ‘HODLer’ community which would not sell their BTC in almost any macro circumstance,” said Stéphane Ouellette, CEO at crypto derivatives provider FRNT Financial.
“The market is now looking to the Fed meeting next week for further confirmation of the risk asset/BTC correlation breakdown.”
NEXT FOR FICKLE BITCOIN?
Samuel Reid, CEO of consulting firm Geometric Energy Corporation said heavy outflows from exchanges could potentially indicate some large buyers were “sniffing out” the end of the bear market.
Yet it’s anyone’s guess whether fickle bitcoin will begin to rally, or slide anew, or if it will swiftly rebound to the embrace of technology stocks.
For the foreseeable future, macroeconomics remain the driver of a market that remains highly speculative in nature.
“The more speculative crypto is, the more it is tied to macro,” said Alex Miller, CEO of blockchain firm Hiro Systems.
“It comes back to, what are the use cases and what’s the productive capability of the asset? The more it’s being used for other things, the less it’ll be tied to macro.”
(This story has been corrected to say cryptocurrency market value has shrunk by two-thirds, not a third in the past year, in paragraph 12)
Reporting by Medha Singh and Lisa Pauline Mattackal in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Alun John in London; Editing by Vidya Ranganathan and Pravin Char
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
