\n
![](\"https:\/\/images.cointelegraph.com\/cdn-cgi\/image\/format=auto,onerror=redirect,quality=90,width=840\/https:\/\/s3.cointelegraph.com\/uploads\/2023-06\/530b946f-f202-4b96-a042-188c6acf9dcd.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n<\/p>\n
In the ongoing legal battle between Coinbase and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the American cryptocurrency exchange has filed a motion to dismiss the SEC\u2019s complaint.<\/p>\n
In a legal document<\/a> filed on Thursday, June 29 with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Coinbase raised concerns about the SEC\u2019s interpretation of securities laws, suggesting the agency was reaching beyond its legal authority. <\/p>\n This move underscores Coinbase\u2019s determination to challenge the SEC\u2019s lawsuit. The motion to dismiss argues that even if all the allegations in the lawsuit are true, the plaintiff does not have a valid legal claim. Coinbase\u2019s legal team stated in the filing:<\/p>\n \u201cEven if the SEC were correct that the assets and services it identifies are within the scope of its existing regulatory authority, this [legal] action must be dismissed on independent grounds that it violates Coinbase\u2019s due process rights and constitutes an extraordinary abuse of process.\u201d\u00a0<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The SEC lawsuit alleged that Coinbase facilitated unregistered trading<\/a> in 12 digital tokens that were deemed securities.<\/p>\n The company has contested this claim and argued that the SEC was applying securities laws to certain digital tokens in ways that significantly deviate from existing legal frameworks. Paul Grewal, chief legal officer of Coinbase, tweeted on June 29, saying that the SEC\u2019s claims \u201cgo far beyond existing law\u201d and should, therefore, be dismissed.<\/p>\n Today @coinbase<\/a> filed our answer and notice of intent to file a motion to dismiss the @SECGov<\/a> case against us. You can read our response for yourself \u2013 our arguments speak for themselves. 1\/2 https:\/\/t.co\/Ld2ZEejhyM<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) June 29, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The SEC\u2019s definition of security includes investment contracts, which have been interpreted by the Supreme Court in the Howey test<\/a> to include transactions where individuals invest money in a common enterprise and expect profits primarily from the efforts of others. In its suit, the SEC named 12 crypto tokens as securities \u2014 Solana (SOL<\/a>), Cardano (ADA<\/a>), Polygon (MATIC<\/a>), The Sandbox (SAND<\/a>), Flow (FLOW), Internet Computer (ICP<\/a>), Near (NEAR<\/a>) and Dash (DASH<\/a>).<\/p>\n Related: <\/em><\/strong>Gary Gensler is hurting the little guys for Wall Street<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n The exchange\u2019s lawyers further argued that in 2021, the SEC declared Coinbase\u2019s registration statement with the commission effective, thereby permitting the company to sell its shares to investors when it went public.<\/p>\n The approval followed an extensive review process that spanned several months and involved in-depth discussions with Coinbase. This allowed Coinbase to trade more than 240 tokens on its spot exchange, including six of the 12 tokens now under dispute.<\/p>\n Magazine: <\/em><\/strong>Web3 Gamer: Apple to fix gaming? SEC hates metaverse, Logan Paul trolled on Steam<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n