\n
![](\"https:\/\/images.cointelegraph.com\/images\/840_aHR0cHM6Ly9zMy5jb2ludGVsZWdyYXBoLmNvbS91cGxvYWRzLzIwMjItMDEvZWE5NjA1YjEtMjA5OC00NjM1LTg1M2UtMjI0YTAyMGJmNGY0LmpwZw==.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n<\/p>\n
Five industry experts appearing before the United States House Energy and Commerce Oversight Subcommittee had different views on how lawmakers should address the energy consumption of cryptocurrencies.<\/p>\n
In written testimony released<\/a> before a Thursday hearing on \u201cCleaning Up Cryptocurrency: The Energy Impacts of Blockchains,\u201d former Comptroller of the Currency Brian Brooks argued that the energy consumption of Bitcoin (BTC<\/a>) mining was \u201ceconomically productive,\u201d given other assets including gold required roughly the same amount of energy for mining, with the \u201ca host of other environmental concerns.\u201d In addition, Brooks said that the traditional global banking system consumed roughly 2.5 times the amount of power to produce the same amount of value BTC does at its current market capitalization.<\/p>\n John Belizaire, the founder and CEO of Soluna Computing and another witness appearing at the hearing, said that from an energy perspective, the miners and computers needed to power crypto are “not a waste” and could encourage the development of renewable energy sources. The CEO said that, unlike other banking systems, Bitcoin mining included the option of turning the systems off<\/a> when necessary, giving miners the ability to absorb excess energy from an area\u2019s electrical grid rather than straining it.<\/p>\n Cornell Tech professor Ari Juels, who has often been a critic of crypto mining as it currently stands, was supportive of the crypto space as a whole but argued in favor of \u201cenergy-efficient alternatives\u201d rather than the proof-of-work (PoW) common for mining. He added that the Ethereum blockchain\u2019s transition to proof-of-stake (PoS) would likely consume \u201cfar less electricity\u201d and have features including smart contracts and nonfungible tokens \u2014 unlike Bitcoin.<\/p>\n \u201cBitcoin does not equal blockchain,\u201d said Juels. \u201cThe tremendous promise of blockchain technology does not require Bitcoin or its energy-intensive component called proof-of-work.\u201d<\/p>\n Steve Wright, a recently retired former general manager of the Chelan County in Washington, similarly hinted that mining firms should consider “mechanisms to assure cryptocurrency production is encouraged toward efficient outcomes as early as possible.” Wright noted that the high value of clean energy costs in the area seems to be pushing many crypto miners towards carbon-emitting, fossil-fired sources of power for “at least the near term.”<\/p>\n Related: <\/em><\/strong>Bitcoin mining becomes more sustainable: Mining Council’s Q4 survey<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n U.S. lawmakers seem to be giving crypto and blockchain a great deal of attention as the space grows. In December, the Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on stablecoins<\/a> and how the U.S. might participate in the race to adopt digital currencies. Brooks also testified at a House committee hearing<\/a> that same month on digital assets\u2019 role in the future of finance.<\/p>\n \u201cAlthough digital tokens are a highly speculative and volatile asset class, they also represent the promise of a more open, more widely shared internet,\u201d said Gregory Zerzan, a shareholder at business law firm Jordan Ramis. \u201cIf policymakers take a cautious approach and foster a pro-innovation environment, the rewards for consumers, investors and all Americans are likely to be great.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n