A nonfungible token (NFT)<\/a> from the CryptoPunks collection worth 77 Ether (ETH<\/a>) was sent to a burn address to be permanently destroyed. However, the collector intended to borrow some money against it to buy another NFT.<\/p>\n NFT collector Brandon Riley added<\/a> CryptoPunk #685 to his collection on March 13 by paying 77 ETH, hoping to hold it for the long term. <\/p>\n Now feels like an appropriate time to introduce #BAYC<\/a> 586 to #Punk<\/a> 685 (acquired a week ago). Hope to hold both for a decade\u2026 LGF! pic.twitter.com\/SLb68rY6MR<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Brandon Riley (@vitalitygrowth) March 19, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As a seasoned investor, Riley knew the importance of procuring new NFTs right before crypto markets took off into a new bull market. As a result, he decided to borrow some money against CryptoPunk #685 by using a popular technique known as wrapping<\/a>. <\/p>\n I did do the first part with my own address I\u2019m step 2. But then when I got to step 5 the burn address was the one listed under \u201c9. proxyInfo\u201d and I was told to follow the directions exactly, so I did. I just shouldn\u2019t have attempted this on my own I guess.<\/p>\n \u2014 Brandon Riley (@vitalitygrowth) March 24, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n While going through the unfamiliar process of wrapping NFTs, Riley accidentally sent the asset to a burn address \u2014 which permanently deleted the NFT from circulation, as shown below.<\/p>\n \u201cI was told to follow the directions exactly, so I did,\u201d explained Riley, but in the process, he ended up losing 77 ETH, which was worth $135,372.16. He explained:<\/p>\n \u201cI was not wrapping this punk to sell it on Blur. It was to be my \u201cforever punk.\u201d The number is exact reverse of my ape. I was only wrapping it because I needed to borrow some liquidity from it.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n While members of Crypto Twitter believed that the NFT collector must have had \u201cdeep pockets,\u201d Riley contradicted the rumors by revealing that he had purchased CryptoPunk #685 through borrowed money.<\/p>\n \u201cI just shouldn\u2019t have attempted this on my own, I guess,\u201d was Riley\u2019s takeaway from the experience. On the other hand, Crypto Twitter also blamed confusing user interfaces and complex instructions for the investor\u2019s loss. As a result, the community unanimously agreed on the need to revamp the front-end processes for crypto ecosystems.<\/p>\n Related: <\/em><\/strong>Improving Bitcoin NFT marketplace infrastructure sets the stage for ecosystem growth<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n NFT wash trading increased by 126% in February, confirmed a CoinGecko report. The top six NFT marketplaces are Magic Eden, OpenSea, Blur, X2Y2, CryptoPunks and LooksRare. X2Y2, Blur and LooksRare saw a rise in wash trading for the fourth straight month, with a total volume of $580 million.<\/p>\n As Cointelegraph previously reported, the issue of wash trading<\/a> stems from a lack of clear regulations.<\/p>\n Magazine: <\/em><\/strong>4 out of 10 NFT sales are fake: Learn to spot the signs of wash trading<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
![](\"https:\/\/s3.cointelegraph.com\/uploads\/2023-03\/a75c2022-71b9-4512-acce-5c9b36ce706c.png\")
![](\"https:\/\/s3.cointelegraph.com\/uploads\/2023-03\/3faab483-bb06-4336-9dd0-c4e3f8580ef1.png\")